How can I put this without sounding hypocritical? I mean I am sitting in front of a friggin' computer ranting about the horrors of high-tech. I think my point is more about awareness of where technology leads us and the blind faith we have in it.
In history there have been many so called disasters linked to the wonders of technology, Titanic, Hindenburg, Estonia to name a few. All makes me laugh simply because mankind never seems to learn. It works like this:1. Man feels bored/lazy/"smart" 2. Let's invent something to make us travel/work/live more comfortably 3. Invention from hell fails man, plane crashes (uh oh!), boat sinks (blubb blubb), X machine explodes ( booom!), elevator crashes ( swissshh, crassshhh!), train runs over stupid people/ in stupid boxes on wheels ( squuiiisssh!) etc. etc. 4. Baad invention!! Let's find a scapegoat. So they create investigation on the disaster how could this happen? The idiots fail to see what the real problem is, humanity's obsession with getting into know-how that backfires on themselves.
Do they learn from this? Noooo! They persist in the erratic creating even worse crap, which causes even more disasters in the long run.Thank God for the UNA Bomber, he did the only right thing, striking back at the God damn scientists and professors teaching us to continue with this shit. He was a math genious. No I am not prepared to return to the stone ages today but I can guarantee you that if you put me in the woods with nothing I would sure as hell survive with whatever nature provides me with, or I would die. Natures course in any case.
But my philosophy taught me that things will eventually even out the score between mankind/nature. Because we cannot continue to evolve at the expense of the balance and harmony in nature. Mankind is selfdestructing in any number of ways and I am cheering on first row as we all die. I refuse to support a race that has become obsessed with taking over everything and survive at all cost. For some of you to grasp the concept of my thinking, and for me to fully cover my chain of thought it would take 20 pages, and this is NOT a final exam in coherence/correlation theories. This is my thinking and my own conclusions fully understanding the interaction between cause and effect. I have no interest in making anyone change their thinking, it would be giving me far too much credit.
What eludes me is how people can say that philosophy and logic is in contradiction, they don't have to be.
I also enjoyed what is now called the Gothenburg BBQ where 60 delinquents, ooopps sorry, youngsters died (sob sob!) Baad fire, baad there -was- nowhere- to- go- but- down: splat! The alternative was to burn to a fine crisp, shit actually they choked to death. Oh I am sorry (not) if I upset anyone but if you didn't catch on before let me repeat to you: I HATE PEOPLE! : Cause and effect.
Well the crime rates where virtually 0 that evening and the following days, hmmm wonder why? So some bongo lips and degos died together with some Swedes.. What a nice cultural mix, ashes to ashes..YES!! You are absolutely right I am a multi racist, I am stating the fact of which members of our beloved community died in there. No actually I would have been deeply grateful if any member of my family was in there!! So shit hits the proverbial fan for some of us, DEAL with it instead of wasting hours on TV portraying sobbing teens harping on about how their "whatever" was choking to death in the toxic fumes. Ho hump! *zzzzzzzzzz* I think they nagged about it for a month to say the least.
So sue me, if you didn't like this one! But then I would be glad to remind you of a word you probably cherish: Democracy. (And all the keywords that goes with it)