In an effort to comply to the demand from certain academics to shut my site down. I will consider a new career as a filmwriter. (I guess this title is only funny to Swedes and people familiar with the Swedish film scene.)
Name: Fred
Website:
Referred by: Just Surfed On In
From:
Time: 1999-04-09 19:17:41
Comments: Since you don't give a shit, I think I'll delve a bit
deeper into your site.
Fred, you are delving deeper into stupid and futile blather about a link
I am referring to, not my actual writings. Let's look at this spiral and
its meaning to the invo- and evolutionary of consciousness. The first problem
is its language.
Bring this up with the author, you lame fuck! It seems to me that "The
spiral is an archetype which has existed in cultures around the world since
the very beginning of civilization. It symbolizes the movement consciousness
toward self understanding, the journey of both the individual humanity searching
both outwardly and inwardly toward truth, that most untouched, mysterious and
beautiful holy of holies, the "I" itself" = The spiral is a symbol of enlightenment
to many people. This kind of simplification of language could be made for the
whole of the article. I'm not attacking the author's writing style, because
he seems to be commenting on some larger body of work in which all these terms
are explained and are complex (maybe). I'm wondering why you included the article.
I included the article because this is about something he is explaining better
than I could. I disagree though with the rest of the hoo haa. My best guess,
judging from your writing, is that you want look intelligent by having that
article on your site.
Apart from many others I have no urge to "look" intelligent. Perhaps since
the article, (written by someone else ) eludes you in it's meaning, the problem
is in your understanding of text. You probably don't understand what he's
writing (if even he understands it).
But I do. I think you should offer links for your readers (the two of
us) to follow up on the article. Don't think that a phrase on your sit like
"this relationship likens itself to the bi-polar electromagnetic field which
we experience as light" impresses anyone.
Neither does your empty blather,Fred. You probably have no clue what
these terms mean nor realize that all he is saying is "this relationship is
like seeing light" (If experiencing a bi-polar electromagnetic field = seeing
light, why not just say "seeing light?"). Please, please, please take your stupid
site!
Please, please, take your stupid invalid critics!
Where is the argument ? I fail to see something substantial here, Fred. Judging
from the time you spend trying to debate me it seems to me more like as if I
have stepped on a sore toe. Could it be your lack of imagination? Your intolerance
against different opinions? Your envy in not being able to handle more than
2 languages, at best 3? Or simply just the fact that it annoys you not to understand
my point of view. may I remind you that noone has forced you to: 1. Visit my
site. 2. Read it. 3. Make comments. My personal opinion/writings is mine, is
mine, is mine.
Name: Gene Siskel
Website:
Referred by: Viewing another Guestbook
From:
Time: 1999-04-08 04:29:02
Comments: Firstly, I have no illusion of some high, holy purpose to bring
down the tellers of truth. Quite the contrary: I enjoy a good anarchist as much
as the next ex-hippie, ex member of the underground, pseudo socialist.
Oh, I am impressed Gene, You are so rebellious! In my own version of
the journey of Diogenes, I happened on to the message you left for REVOLUTIONARIA
MUERTE, so I’m taking you up on your challenge. I will leave a similar message
on her page. I just started with you. And I am NOT leaving an e-mail address
on purpose. If you have an intelligent and relevant response to me, post it
on your own page.
E-mail would have been less embarrassing for you , but it is your call Gene.
My e-mail is too busy as it is now. Trust me, I’ll check for it sometime in
the next week. Another disclaimer: yes, I am a resident of the United States.
However, I am a student of world history, from Ancient Greece to the Soviet
Union.
If you are a student then you have yet much to learn. But I am not overly
impressed by students in the Universities of USA. You are right about one
thing: there isn’t much history here yet.
What little history you have can be learnt in a week. We did have one
HELL of a civil war, which made for interesting historical references, but not
too much else.
I would be glad to take you up on a challenge in American history especially
concerning the slavery issue and the building of economics in both the UK and
US. We could also talk about the sociocultural impact on 3 continents due to
the slavery, etc. Our constitution for example, roots itself in the charter
of the City of Athens, The writings of Julius Caesar and Marcus Aurelius, the
confederation documents of the Hanseatic League, and the Magna Carta, to mention
a few documents. So for the next few generations at least, we’ll still have
to settle for being plagiarists.
I appreciate your sincerity on this one. I think you can write off the
chauvinistic comments about US Citizens and their lack of understanding of Europe.
Not very likely, as long as 99% of the Americans I encounter shows these
huge lackings in general knowledge. You folks have too many countries over
there. We can’t study them all and still have time to eat, fornicate, and bathe
on occasion.
A very lame excuse to remain ignorant, ad nauseum, as you so well put it.
Don’t ask us to choose, please. The intelligentsia of any given society will
have at least some small understanding of other cultures, but to assume ignorance
based on someone’s lack of the knowledge that Sweden was once the major Naval
Power in Europe, Gustav II Adolph, the Thirty Year’s War, or any other item
in Northern European culture shaping history commits Non Quid Pro Quo.
I would not go further down that road if I was you. I will stop ranting
on this now, I believe I have proved my point, at the very least in my case.
Really, is that so? That said, I will grant you a certain method to your
version of madness, but it is not entertaining.
I am not here to entertain you, Einstein. Your response to this however is.
You simply are not funny.
I agree, I am hysterical. On the contrary, you are very negatively disturbing.
Based on what, your personal view, general view? I think it is negatively
disturbing to write 2 A4's in my guestbook. Fascism is, I admit, in vogue
at this time: case in point, the Republican Party, but that does not make it
intelligent, only popular with a sector of humanity.
I guess you being an American know all about that, n'est ce pas? One
can, however, be a fascist without being a Nazi.
I sincerely hope you can tell the difference. Not to say that misanthropy
is necessarily bad or not humorous; to be honest I am very curious as to how
the rats or the cockroaches are going to do after evolution is completely through
with us.
Evolution IS completely through with us, now let's move on to the next creation.
The point is, I do not believe that this has happened yet: we aren’t extinct,
so we still have a shot. Be that as it may, that is a personal opinion.
How come you you don't allow others to have the same "luxury"? As to
YOUR personal opinion, my reaction is that "It is the peawit who judges by the
group." I believe that is paraphrased from Schoeppenhaur, a philosopher you
admit ignorance to.
Ouch! That cut, like a plastic knife. I don’t like all of his stuff but
I have to agree with the comment. We have white supremacists in our country,
it’s just that intelligent people don’t socialize with them, they are embarrassed
by them.
Completely out of context,Gene. I do thank God if he/she/it exists, that
Germany still has the copyright on neoNazis, and come now. You REALLY don’t
want to put yourself in the same category with those folks now do you?
I didn't realize I was. I think that if you put me there it says more about
you than about me. I think any discussion as to whether or not the holocaust
took place or who was the bigger monster (Stalin or Hitler) is ridiculous.
You are making these comparisons, not me! I have heard other misanthropic
journal writers make comments like where is Hitler now that we need him: case
in point, someone you mention; the Misanthropic Bitch. The difference is, (please
excuse my value judgment here, but you did ask for that) she hates everyone,
while you appear to hate Jews, with a little venom for the Hispanics if one
decides to cross you.
Goes directly to prove how little you understand from my writings, I am merely
mentioning the most blatant mistakes in the general debating's, not only here
in Sweden but also in the rest of the world. That makes her a misanthrope
and you a bigot, not something someone who professes to have your intelligence
should be proud of.
Interesting choice of words. I think most bigots thrives in the Universities,
and you are on thin ice here my friend. I admit to have failed to mention all
the different hypocrisies in society but if I was to bring up the Swedish, the
Nazi or the Palestinian hypocrisies. Would it make me less bigot in your eyes?
I don't think so. "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and "Biarritz" are
as hopelessly out of date as phrenology. One must simply update their library
once in a while, and the folks in Serbia make the Israelis look like pikers
(a reference to the notoriously cheap discoverer of Pike’s Peak in the American
West). References to Palestine are outdated and not very relevant, unless they
are on your application for Gruppenfueher.
Like I said in the disclaimer "nothing in here is new or original". Please
excuse my snide comment. Bigotry is just not funny either.
Neither is utter stupidity,I hold you guilty as charged on both counts.
The same sort of thing applies to one of your articles in particular, "I HATE
CHILDREN" for one. Logic is most definitely not your forte, as demonstrated
by the negation of the mental dysfunction of Pedophilia.
I thought it was below you to stoop to populist views, your ignorance in
the psychiatric field is matched only by your smugness. Child fanciers do
not do this as a "lark," it is their Sex of Preference. I hesitate to use the
word normal (who is normal? Certainly not me.) but the norm is where most folks
reside, and I don’t think ANYONE with exception of a Pedophile would hold with
sexual attraction to children as a day to day item to be emulated. This links
to the previous logical error, with this Quid Pro Quo based on over generalization.
In fact, your logic is specious at best: anyone who says that to prove his point
he needs 20 pages is explaining a proof of FEMAT’s last theorem, not a social
issue. And non-linear logic is NOT logic, it is philosophy.
I see no contradiction in the two. When you confuse them, you embarrass
only yourself. This is social discussion, not quantum physics.
Uh oh, big mistake there I suspect strongly that you do not grasp what intelligence
is, making a comment like that. No doubt on who stepped in it this time.
You are committing Non-sequiter, a logical fallacy. I have to assume, pursuant
to your introductory warning, that you are attempting to be satirical, vis a
vis your spelling of "CEREAL" vice "SERIAL."
I wonder if you have ever fucked, seeing how seriously unfunny YOU are. Excuse
the personal remark. By the way, people aren’t frightened by Ted Bundy,
they’re disgusted by him, both are reactions I personally feel are mistaken,
but well, there it is. Old Ted and Son of Sam and John Wayne Gacy are aberrations.
Why generalize? I am not. For the record; I think that J.W .Gacy and D. Berkowitz
is 2 out of many deviant and uninteresting individuals. Species in decline
don’t weed out members, they fight for territory: look up any endangered species
being squeezed, and you will have to admit this is true. Only rogues kill for
other than food or self preservation (hunters excluded, admittedly another aberration).
Look up lion or tiger man-eater behavior if you doubt this.
Thank you for the lesson in Darwinism. But you are too educated to accept
that breaking a taboo of society, such as publicly advocating the violent anarchistic
overthrow of society (protected in most countries by "freedom of speech") is
anything like the psychotic action of the sociopath.
Please think about your poor fellow country men , they cannot follow your
chain of thought if you express yourself so academically, bigotry? No species
mutilates itself: members who do this are ostracized: it isn’t evolutionarily
sound. That’s as far as I want to go with a specific review. I could continue
with all of this, but quite frankly, I found your material to self-absorbed
and not terribly interesting, so I’ll wrap this up with an uncharacteristically
general critique, for which I apologize, and a few suggestions: Your writing
style is marginal.
Ouch , stop poking at me with that plastic knife, it might break. Get
a Grammar checker: MS word has a fair one. I use it all the time. Grammatik
is better but expensive. I realize that English is your second language, but
your usage should be embarrassing to you.
Actually it is my 3rd out of 6 and I never bothered to open the books in
school. Perhaps taking into consideration dealing with academic assholes I should
have. But where I lack in grammar you lack equally in arguments so that makes
this debate 1-1. Also, one should never invent words; it tends to make you
look silly.
You don't invent words still you look sillier than I do. Words are about
communication and if people understand what I am trying to say making up a new
word, THAT makes me smart and imaginative while you are stuck with whatever
blunt tool's your grammar offers. You have way too many links. This is supposed
to be your opinion: if it has value, it largely should support itself. Intellectual
sites tend to suffer when Cartoons are added; it seems to negate them.
Are you trying to label me? Lose the cartoons too. Multiple personalities
DESERVE to be explained, not lampooned. Lose the "Bitchin’ Smart" web ring.
True Misanthropes by definition ARE NOT JOINERS. Web rings are for people to
whom belonging to a club is a terribly important part of their lives.
Something has definitely eluded you here. Besides, have you seen "Space
Fem’s" home page? Oh, please, she sounds like a rerun of a 1979 George Carlin
HBO special, and believe me, he did it so much better.
Haven't seen it, I am not surprised you have, though. Did you spend as much
time arguing with her? The name calling contest you’ve involved yourself
in makes you look pathetic. You must be better than the name calling you’ve
resorted to. REVOLUTIONARIA MUERTE is making you look like, "Oh yeah? Well yo’
momma….." et cetera, ad nauseum. My call: you’ve lost that one. Try to do it
gracefully: it makes you at least appear to look like an adult.
I have to admit for the first time that you have a valid point there, I rather
forget that idiotic two way blather. Did us both injustice. Lose the picture.
It makes you look like a drunken whore in, as one American put it so well, "…a
Panama City ‘Sailor-wanna-hump-hump bar." No offense.
I would only take offense if I was to see your picture anywhere on the net.
I’m sure you aren’t one, just a rotten picture. Let me repeat: Lose the cartoons
too. And If you’re trying to be sarcastic, I JUST DON’T GET THE JOKE. I DIDN’T
LAUGH ONCE.
I am now convinced never to join in the academic world, because if I would
be half as unfunny as you are, I would instantly put a gun to my head and pull
the trigger. And before you discount me, here is the intellectual Resume
Vitae: 3 years at the University of Michigan, 2 years at the George Washington
University, Washington, DC, 3 years at the University of Houston, Past member
of the Students for a Democratic Society, The Rainbow People’s Party, NORML,
The Socialist Worker’s Party, Majors in Nuclear Engineering, Physics; minors
in Computer Aided Design/Robotics, Literature, and English. Cumulative Grade
Point: 3.8, no degrees completed. I have paid my dues in the search for meaningful
education, and no, I didn’t find it either.
Excuse me, but what then is your problem with me? I am yet to hear one good
argument. Grow up and stop idolizing Ted Kozinsky, a true nut case if ever
there was one. He was a deviant, not a social hero, or revolutionary. I met
Abbie Hoffman, John Sinclair, and Bernadine Dorhn (just to be clear, not an
American, Northern Irish) to name a few, and THEY were revolutionaries. Ted’s
just a hermit with an attitude.
Are you aware that he is a math genious? I am also the only other MENSA
society drop out I have ever met. The chapter that begged me and my 160+ IQ(any
figure above this is extrapolated, and therefore meaningless)/1350+ SAT to join
them was banal to the point of nausea, but I won’t apply that to all of them,
as I have not met them and I try not to generalize.
Why become humble all of a sudden , stick to your self-righteous arrogance,
that would at least make you consistent in your blather. You asked, you
got. I remain, of course, as full of shit as the rest of the human race, so
take this as you will, comment as you see fit and I may even reply, but do it
appropriately: meaningless flames will probably be ignored by me, the same as
any intelligent individual would react to tripe.
How well you put that! On to REVOLUTIONARIA MUERTE. Her review is next.